Friends, Keep Your Daughters Out of Kansas!
A Kansas appellate court has held that the state can punish homosexual sex with a minor more severely than heterosexual sex with a minor. (On the facts of the case, the male defendant got a 17-year sentence for having sex (at age 18) with a male 14-year-old. Had he had sex with a female 14-year-old, his maximum sentence would have been a year and three months.)
According to the newspaper account of the ruling, the court held that the distinction between same-gender and opposite-gender sex with a minor is justified in part by the state's interest in "encourag[ing] and preserv[ing] the traditional sexual mores of society."
Huh? Remember, the distinction that the court has to justify is different punishment for sex with a minor. Is there any legitimate sense in which the "traditional sexual mores of society" include sex with underage people of the opposite sex?
According to the newspaper account of the ruling, the court held that the distinction between same-gender and opposite-gender sex with a minor is justified in part by the state's interest in "encourag[ing] and preserv[ing] the traditional sexual mores of society."
Huh? Remember, the distinction that the court has to justify is different punishment for sex with a minor. Is there any legitimate sense in which the "traditional sexual mores of society" include sex with underage people of the opposite sex?


In a stunning bid to create a more powerful image for their organization, the rebel militant 
