Is That Legal?

No wonder those kids at Columbia are such morons, with professors like you teaching the young it will be amazing if this country survives at all!

Clearly they're doing a fine job at Marquette.

The best part of this whole ordeal is seeing that the VDare folks, when given enough rope, will gladly hang themselves with it. There's no need to mention the fact that they take money from the good folks at Stormfront.org or the fact that they used to run columns by a higher-up in the White Citizens' Councils.

"Having looked at your website, it is clear to me that your motivation is somewhat different than that of the Anglo-Saxon slaveowners who blighted America's future back in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries."

Well, I guess I do agree with him on _that_ point. As far as I can tell Eric does have a motivation somewhat different from the Anglo-saxon slaveowners who blighted America's future. I even agree that (obviously) the Anglo-Saxon slaveowners blighted America's futre. See, we can all agree on something!

"your motivation is somewhat different than that of the Anglo-Saxon slaveowners"
Blech, different from, different from, different from. I reject the idea that this person could be a retired professor. Even I, a lowly high school drop out know that it is different from, not different than. Double blech. Besides, he appears to be a bit dishonest, does he not?

If the good folks at VDARE.com and other pro-immigration reform sites are at fault, it's that they refuse to play for keeps. They adhere to outdated rules on political warfare to which left-wing scumbags such as Muller and the Columbia U. terrorists merely play lip service.

The non-white invasion of America is NOT an inevitable force of nature. It is the result of deliberate government policy. It can therefore be halted and reversed. And when that happens, of course, we will see increasing racial tension, separation, and race war that will make the recent break-up of Yugoslavia look like a children's tea party.

Already, blacks and mestizos have declared a low-level race war on white Americans. The results of this unilateral declaration of war are in the papers every day: threats, intimidation, anti-American demonstrations, rapes, killings, terrorism. Just a few weeks ago, a large pack of blacks in Long Beach attacked and beat three young, white American girls in a classic example of anti-white hate.

As white Americans continue to organize and mobilize, and as the voices raised at VDARE.com get louder, the conflict is only going to get worse. Muller and his commie buddies better get used to it.

My only wish is that American patriots would start getting serious about taking our country back.

A blog can certainly stir up quite a bit of slime from the bottom of the gene pool.

Professor Muller, I'm impressed. Last week you were just another UNC law professor. Now you also teach at Columbia, head a student terrorist organization, control the media (in North Carolina at least), and have a hand in deciding government policy.

I'm amazed you can still find time to blog.

Congratulations on your success, and remember our old school motto, "Illegitimi non carborundum."

Perhaps Professor (retired) Fraser will now join us all in a rousing chorus of his theme song.

I agree wholeheartedly with Professor Andrew Fraser, don't think I can top that. God Bless the Minutemen and keep going!

If the small faction of anti-immigrant obsessives won, they would get the stagnant, idea-free homeland they deserve. A decaying, defensively grandiose, autocratically managed country club surrounded by layers of barbed wire uncrossable in either direction. Soon enough, sane people would be trying to get out of such a place, not into it.

The majority of Americans, however, also intend to keep on living here, and we believe in a country that continues to accept new people and new ideas. For example, the immigrants who were founding members in a quarter of all California business startups 1995-2005.

I don't agree with everything written on Vdare, but some of the issues raised by some of their writers (e.g., Steve Sailer) are worthy of intelligent discussion -- not just reflexive accusations of racism.

It seems that on both sides of the immigration issue, there are dogmatists; wouldn't it better to have an empirical discussion about it? Consider, for example the previous post by Martha Bridgegam, linking to the study of immigrant entrepreneurs with Steve Sailer's discussion of the same study.

My views aren't in lockstep with Sailer's, but his analysis begs crucial questions. For example: Would America be better off if we adjusted our immigration policy to let in more highly educated Indian tech entrepreneurs and fewer poorly educated Mexican laborers? Perhaps neither Muller nor Sailer would agree with me when I say we should invite more highly educated immigrants and fewer poorly educated ones.

Said about Steve Sailor, "his analysis begs crucial questions."

You can say that again!
(I suppose you were [mis]using this expression to mean 'raises' certain questions, but I think the proper use of the expression is clearly the right one.)

Matt:

You're right, I should have written "raises crucial questions" instead of "begs". Now that we've gotten that correction out of the way, what questions do you suggest Sailer's analysis "begs"? Is there a particular essay of his that you've read and would like to discuss?

Dave