« "Citizenship . . . Bears No Relationship To . . . Loyalty." | Main | Any Port In A Storm. »
May 20, 2005
These Mistake's Drive Me Nut's
City schools will allow fliers; county's won't
Yes. That's right. Should have been "school's" and "flier's." Duh.
Posted by Eric at May 20, 2005 6:02 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.isthatlegal.org/cgi-bin/mt33/mt-tb.cgi/177.
Comments
Eric, your criticism should have been aimed at the print edition only. The online edition was corrected. The print edition is very challenging to interpret, because somebody forgot the semicolon, and besides that, the line break is awkward.
City schools will post
fliers county's won't
The semicolon does fix the problem, though: City schools will post fliers; the schools of the county will not. It even makes a strained kind of sense without the semicolon: City schools wil post fliers [that the] county's [schools] won't. No? OK, it was an error. But they fixed it online.
Posted by: Sally at May 20, 2005 10:51 AM
Theirs one bad headline!
Posted by: K at May 20, 2005 12:14 PM
Its like they don't even see there own mistakes'!!!
Posted by: John A at May 20, 2005 12:26 PM
Uh, no. Schools and fliers are plural, not possessive.
Posted by: rivlax at May 20, 2005 12:52 PM
Maybe I'm missing something, but where is the error in the headline? An apostrophe properly belongs in the word "county's," since this is evidently shorthand for "county's schools." The city schools will allow fliers, and the county's schools won't. Right?
Posted by: Alex S. at May 20, 2005 2:12 PM
Gee wilikers, you're picky! While I suppose it would be preferable for the editor to have insisted on parallel possessive constructions ("City's schools will allow fliers, county's won't"), his error is surely one of style rather than grammar. There's nothing gramatically incorrect about using a possessive to parallel a mere adjective (consider: "Good blogs will allow comments; mine won't").
Or is the error so bold I've missed it?
Posted by: Anonymous at May 20, 2005 2:44 PM
hehe
Posted by: The Liberal Avenger at May 20, 2005 3:32 PM
And who said that lawyers couldn't be funny?
Posted by: The Liberal Avenger at May 20, 2005 3:37 PM
How ya figure? But just in case I'm wrong, let's run through it:
In the headline, "City schools will allow fliers; county's won't," only "county's" is possessive. "Schools" is plural and "fliers" is plural.
Looks good to me. Of course, I'm just an idealistic pro bono lawyer who can barely keep the lights on (and who's ending sentences with prepositions). Am I missing something?
Posted by: Britt Newby at May 20, 2005 4:04 PM
Eric- I read the article to refer to the schools of Orange County-- Orange County's schools. Not sure what you mean here. Maybe you're making a joke that I don't get.
Posted by: Dave S. at May 20, 2005 4:46 PM
Surely you jest, Professor. Or have you been taking spelling lessons from Peter Irons? (See Irons/Malkin e-mail exchange).
Posted by: W.J.Hopwood at May 20, 2005 8:46 PM
You're all wrong, as are the headline editors. "Schools" is a verb, and "Will"--I'm assuming Will Smith--its direct object. The headline is supposed to read as follows:
City schools Will and allows fliers, as counties are wont to do.
Posted by: The Good Reverend at May 20, 2005 11:43 PM
I mean, who makes grammatical mistakes' in titles of that sort? Outrageous.
Posted by: John Stuart at May 24, 2005 4:30 PM