« Picture perfect | Main | Test your fool I.Q. »

April 1, 2005

The kids were all right. More or less.

P
rofessor of composition Erika Lindemann set out on a mission. She wanted to find out if it was true that contemporary undergraduates were inferior to their predecessors when it came to writing. So she went way back: into the UNC archives from before the Civil War. Some 1,800 documents later, she has her conclusion: No, they weren't better writers. But they were maybe a bit more prone to mischief.

Posted by Eric at April 1, 2005 12:19 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.isthatlegal.org/cgi-bin/mt33/mt-tb.cgi/67.

Comments

I would agree with the assertion that kids back in the day were probably better pranksters than they are today, when now any infraction could potentially get you expelled, assessed a huge fine, or otherwise put you in jeopardy of your whole academic career.

Posted by: Sean S. at April 1, 2005 3:24 PM

Yes, they were quite the pranksters!

"Disorder among the students was common in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Not atypical were the 'riots' of 1799, 1816, and 1840. In his History of the University of North Carolina, Kemp P. Battle reports on students expelled or suspended for 'firing of pistols,' assault, arson, drunkenness, throwing rocks at their tutors, stealing their professor's horses, and evening dueling."

Posted by: Sally at April 1, 2005 4:22 PM

If you want to read about collegiate pranks in America (past and present (to when the book was written)), see if you can't find the book If at all possible, involve a cow. I read it years ago and it's a lot of fun.

I'd say modern pranksters (particularly MIT & Caltech, though U. Wisconsin managed some great ones in the early 1980s) are FAR more creative than some of the more straightforward destructiveness of the olden days.

Posted by: Lis Riba at April 1, 2005 10:48 PM