« "No One Knew ..." | Main | Ninety-Eight-Point-One Percent of German Boys Age Ten and Over Were in the Hitler Youth (or the Deutsches Jungvolk) in Early 1939, when the New Pope Was Twelve Years Old. »

April 20, 2005

Airbrushing the Past

I
t is fascinating to see the reactions I'm getting to my suggestion that the new pope has airbrushed the story of Nazism and his family. That is, after all, all I've asserted: that the Pope's shared memories about the period and his older brother's assertion that "resistance was truly impossible" reflect an uncomortable effort to cast his family's wartime lives in as favorable a light as possible. I have not once suggested that he or his family were members of the NSDAP; indeed, I've said just the opposite. Yet the commenters are lining up to decry my scrutiny of the new Pope's attitude toward his and his family's past. Odd.

Here's another little factoid to chew on: one of the tropes that is now circulating about the Pope's childhood is that his father was "an anti-Nazi whose attempts to rein in the activities of Hitler's Brown Shirts forced the family to move home several times." Surely only the new Pope or a member of his family could be the source of such a claim.

I don't doubt for a moment that the Ratzinger family were no supporters of the Nazis, or that his father may have had disagreements with local party officials. But what are we to make of this claim that the father "attempt[ed] to rein in the Brown Shirts?" Mr. Ratzinger "attempted to rein in the Brown Shirts," and was never arrested? Never put into a concentration camp? Do you really believe that? Or do you instead see an effort to polish a more ordinary story?

I see the latter. And I'm not the only one. Here's what John Allen, Ratzinger's biographer and a reporter for the National Catholic Reporter, had to say on the subject back in 2000:

The question of Ratzinger and the Third Reich also merits special attention. Neither Ratzinger nor any member of his family was a National Socialist. Ratzinger has said several times that his father's criticism of the Nazis was responsible for the four moves the family made during Ratzinger's first ten years. Such opposition by itself is unremarkable; many German Catholics complained about the party's encroachment on the church. Neither the elder Ratzinger nor either of the two sons took part in any kind of resistance. Although Ratzinger today calls such resistance "impossible," there were in fact several models in his immediate orbit, including members of the Communist Party, Jehovah's Witnesses, and fellow Catholics.

Posted by Eric at April 20, 2005 10:26 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.isthatlegal.org/cgi-bin/mt33/mt-tb.cgi/117.

Comments

On Twaddle re Pope Benedict XVI

Membership in the Hitler Youth was mandatory at that time for people of Ratzinger's age. Even if it were not, a teen-age boy is not quite as clear-headed ethically as is an adult. He was also in the Wehrmacht, and deserted. Is he bad for deserting and going over to the enemy? Or good for leaving the Nazis and helping US?

The experience he had in Germany as a young man has made this pope (like his predecessor) quite sensitive to the claims of members of other religions to respect.

Posted by: Dennis J. Tuchler at April 20, 2005 11:23 AM

The biography comment I saw said that his father picked up and moved the family several times because of his police job, but that one time they moved because the father decided he had way too many Nazi neighbors to make life comfortable or safe for non-Nazis like him and his family. This seems a little more reasonable.

Posted by: Maureen at April 20, 2005 12:52 PM

Some elements of the Catholic church tacitly supported the NSDAP up until 1933; Effective Catholic resistance was pretty much supressed by 1937/1938[USHMM, German Churches and the NAZI State]


Resitance to the Fascist, Nazi, and Tojo regimes was incredibly dangerous; the courage of the righteous gentiles is simply astounding. The White Rose has already been mentioned, but there are other stories to be told.


One example is [Yad Vashem] Chiune Sugihara, Japanese Consol, who with help from Jan Zwartendijk, a Dutchman, enabled 2200 jews to escape from Lithuania [remember.org: David Kranzler, The Story of Jan Zwartendijk


The trees that line the Avenue of The Righteous Amongst The Nations at Yad Vashem are anchors of hope to pull oneself back from the blackness of the rest of the site; and yet they number only 20,757, and only 410 of these were German.


The moral courage of a [Yad Vashem] Bernhard Lichtenberg is immense, yet as the last real point of German Catholic resistance, it strains against the weight of 6,000,000


Posted by: Simon Spero at April 20, 2005 1:09 PM

The oral courage some found to oppose the Nazis is commendable to say the least, and it is a sad commentary on human nature to note that such courage is all too rarely seen.

I wonder whether Bricklayer would consider it an act of moral courage to ask Ann Coulter a simple question about her position on a particular conflict in light of the likely and actual threats of serious violence that may erupt from her thuggish fascistic audience members? We probably would find that he regrets that "uncivil" things may be said to the questioner, but that he'll excuse the incivility because, after all, one can't expect not to be threatened when attending a fascist teach-in unless you blindly follow the partly line.

I'm sure we can excuse Papa BXVI's youthful membership in the Hitler Youth for many reasons, but I don't think it beyond the pale to ask Papa to be fully honest about it.

pike

Posted by: pike at April 20, 2005 2:31 PM

Eric,

You're a man with limited time on his hands. This is a finite world with finite resources. Why go down this road?

It is easy for a skeptical Catholic to doubt your sincerity in this matter. Leftists, in general, are hostile to dogmatic Catholics. Perhaps also you blame him for interfering in the 2004 election. The fact is, there is ample cause for concern that your motives are entirely sinister. In fact, that you're redoubling your efforts in the face of criticism seems to prove you haven't listened to caution on this.

If anything, all you are doing is proving that the left hates Catholics.

Posted by: Sydney Carton at April 20, 2005 3:00 PM

Just about everything a Pope does is beyond The Pale...

Posted by: Simon Spero at April 20, 2005 3:27 PM

He was also in the Wehrmacht, and deserted. Is he bad for deserting and going over to the enemy?

No, because he didn't go over to the enemy. He went home. Here's what happened, in his own words:

"Hitler's death finally strengthened our hope that things would soon end. The unhurried manner of the American advance, however, deferred more and more the day of liberation. At the end of April or the beginning of May -- I do not remember precisely -- I decided to go home."

-Rueters

He was a discontented soldier who abandoned a war that was clearly already lost. I don't see anything treasonous in that, but I don't see anything heroic in it either.

Posted by: Beth at April 20, 2005 5:55 PM